ImmortalWrt/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.15/950-0870-drm-vc4-Make-sure-we-don-t-end-up-with-a-core-clock-.patch
Álvaro Fernández Rojas 20ea6adbf1 bcm27xx: add support for linux v5.15
Build system: x86_64
Build-tested: bcm2708, bcm2709, bcm2710, bcm2711
Run-tested: bcm2708/RPiB+, bcm2709/RPi3B, bcm2710/RPi3B, bcm2711/RPi4B

Signed-off-by: Marty Jones <mj8263788@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
2022-05-17 15:11:22 +02:00

59 lines
2.1 KiB
Diff

From 9d71b0d4e30692d0d186352b494ef4e70234ca7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 17:09:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Make sure we don't end up with a core clock
too high
Following the clock rate range improvements to the clock framework,
trying to set a disjoint range on a clock will now result in an error.
Thus, we can't set a minimum rate higher than the maximum reported by
the firmware, or clk_set_min_rate() will fail.
Thus we need to clamp the rate we are about to ask for to the maximum
rate possible on that clock.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c
@@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ static void vc4_atomic_commit_tail(struc
struct vc4_hvs_state *new_hvs_state;
struct drm_crtc *crtc;
struct vc4_hvs_state *old_hvs_state;
+ unsigned long max_clock_rate = clk_get_max_rate(hvs->core_clk);
unsigned int channel;
int i;
@@ -397,8 +398,8 @@ static void vc4_atomic_commit_tail(struc
if (vc4->hvs && vc4->hvs->hvs5) {
unsigned long state_rate = max(old_hvs_state->core_clock_rate,
new_hvs_state->core_clock_rate);
- unsigned long core_rate = max_t(unsigned long,
- 500000000, state_rate);
+ unsigned long core_rate = clamp_t(unsigned long, state_rate,
+ 500000000, max_clock_rate);
WARN_ON(clk_set_min_rate(hvs->core_clk, core_rate));
}
@@ -427,10 +428,13 @@ static void vc4_atomic_commit_tail(struc
drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes(dev, state);
if (vc4->hvs && vc4->hvs->hvs5) {
- drm_dbg(dev, "Running the core clock at %lu Hz\n",
- new_hvs_state->core_clock_rate);
+ unsigned long core_rate = min_t(unsigned long,
+ max_clock_rate,
+ new_hvs_state->core_clock_rate);
+
+ drm_dbg(dev, "Running the core clock at %lu Hz\n", core_rate);
- WARN_ON(clk_set_min_rate(hvs->core_clk, new_hvs_state->core_clock_rate));
+ WARN_ON(clk_set_min_rate(hvs->core_clk, core_rate));
drm_dbg(dev, "Core clock actual rate: %lu Hz\n",
clk_get_rate(hvs->core_clk));